Skip to content
(561) 397-9829 Start a conversation
Menu

The legal weapons / Published: / Last reviewed: / 7 minute read

Why Is My Merchant Cash Advance Funder Calling Me, and What Can It Legally Do?

The limits are threats, deception, and debits the contract does not allow.

Written and reviewed by the Anchor Resolve editorial team.

Key points

  • MCA agreements commonly give the funder the right to see the business’s bank activity, so a call can come the same day a debit fails.
  • The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act generally does not cover business debt, so its limits on call times and call frequency usually do not apply to MCA collection.
  • Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce, and the FTC has used it against MCA companies on behalf of small businesses.
  • Threats of violence are crimes in every state, whatever the debt, and threatening calls are a matter for law enforcement.
  • Enrolling in a debt relief program does not stop a funder from calling, collecting, or suing while balances are being renegotiated.

Calls from a merchant cash advance funder usually mean one of three things: a debit was rejected or missed, the funder has declared a default, or it is trying to reach the owner who signed the personal guarantee. Most of what a funder does next is lawful even when it feels relentless: calling, writing, sending notices to your customers under the lien it filed when you signed, demanding payment under the guarantee, and suing. The federal consumer collection rules many owners know about generally do not cover business debt. What still limits a funder is the FTC Act, state law, criminal law, and your own contract. What any of this means for your situation is a question for a licensed attorney in your state.

Why does a funder start calling?

Almost always because something changed on the account. The most common triggers are a rejected debit, a pattern of smaller deposits than the funder expected, a change of bank account or card processor, a new advance from another funder showing up in your statements, or a default the funder has already declared. MCA agreements commonly give the funder the right to see your bank activity, so the call can come the same day a debit fails.

The number of calls usually tracks the stage. Early calls tend to come from the funder’s own collections desk. After a default is declared, calls may come from an outside collection firm or from the funder’s attorney, and the subject usually shifts from the missed payment to the full accelerated balance. Our guide to what a default notice from your funder means covers the letter that often arrives alongside them.

Who else might be calling about the same debt?

Not every call about an MCA comes from the funder you owe. Owners in distress commonly hear from four kinds of callers:

Who calls a business owner about MCA debt
Caller What the call is usually about
The funder’s collections desk A failed debit, a payment plan inside the existing agreement, or a declared default
An outside collection firm or the funder’s attorney The accelerated balance, the personal guarantee, and the funder’s next legal step
A broker A new advance, often pitched as a way to cover the old one, which adds another position to the stack
A debt relief firm you never contacted An unsolicited pitch. A legitimate firm waits for you to reach out, and Anchor Resolve never cold calls

Summarized from common MCA collection practice. Who calls, and how often, varies by funder.

The broker call deserves special caution, because a new advance taken to cover an old one is how most stacks grow. Our guide to MCA stacking shows the arithmetic.

What can a funder lawfully do?

A good deal. Under a typical MCA agreement and state law, a funder may generally call and email about a default, send demand letters, enforce the agreement’s fee and acceleration terms, keep its UCC-1 financing statement on file, notify your processor, marketplaces, or customers to pay it directly under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, section 9-406, demand payment from the owner under a personal guarantee, and sue. After a judgment, court procedures such as restraining notices and levies become available. Distressing is not the same as unlawful.

Source: Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, section 9-406.

Why don’t consumer collection rules protect me?

Because of how the law defines a debt. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act covers obligations arising from transactions primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, according to its definitions at 15 U.S.C. section 1692a. A merchant cash advance is a business transaction, so it generally falls outside the Act, and with it the limits on call times, call frequency, and required notices that consumer debtors rely on. State consumer collection laws built on the same model usually follow the same line. A licensed attorney can tell you whether anything in your state’s law reaches further.

Source: 15 U.S.C. section 1692a, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act definitions.

Where are the limits?

Business debt is not lawless. Four things still limit a funder:

  • The FTC Act. Section 5 prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce, and it is not limited to consumers. The Federal Trade Commission has used it against MCA companies on behalf of small businesses.
  • State law. State attorneys general enforce their own unfair practices laws. California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation applied prohibitions on unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices to commercial financing for California small businesses, effective October 1, 2023.
  • Criminal law. Threats of violence are crimes in every state, whatever the debt.
  • Your contract. The agreement defines what may be debited and when. Debits beyond what it authorizes, or after the purchased amount has been collected, are the kind of conduct regulators have pursued.
Sources: 15 U.S.C. section 45(a); California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, commercial financing regulations, effective October 1, 2023.

$20.3M

The judgment a federal court entered against merchant cash advance operator Jonathan Braun of RCG Advances in the FTC’s case, after the court noted threats and profanities directed at small business owners. He was also permanently banned from the MCA and debt collection industries.

Source: Federal Trade Commission press releases, October 2023 and February 14, 2024

The public record has other examples. In April 2021, Yellowstone Capital and related defendants agreed to pay more than $9.8 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that included taking money from businesses’ accounts without permission. In January 2025 the New York Attorney General secured a judgment of $1.065 billion against Yellowstone Capital and related entities, including cancellation of about $534.6 million owed by small businesses. None of this means every aggressive funder is breaking the law. It means some conduct has already been tested in court.

Sources: Federal Trade Commission, April 2021; New York Attorney General, January 2025.

What usually follows if the calls go unanswered?

The process usually continues on the funder’s schedule. A funder that cannot reach the business commonly moves on to letters, UCC notices to customers and processors, a demand on the personal guarantee, and a lawsuit, and an unanswered lawsuit can end in a default judgment. Not answering a call is not the same as missing a court deadline, but court papers, once served, carry deadlines that do run. The full sequence is in our guide to what happens if you default on a merchant cash advance.

Who should I talk to?

If the calls include threats, that is a matter for law enforcement. For everything else, a licensed attorney in your state can tell you what the funder may lawfully do in your situation, whether any conduct crosses a legal line, and what your agreement says. Where to report conduct you believe is unlawful is covered in our guide to whether debt collection laws protect business owners from MCA funders.

Anchor Resolve is not a law firm. Enrolling in a debt relief program does not stop a funder from calling, collecting, or suing while balances are being renegotiated.

Common questions

Can an MCA funder call my personal cell phone?

Usually, yes. The number is often on the application, and the owner who signed a personal guarantee is someone the funder may lawfully contact about the debt. Federal consumer collection limits generally do not apply to business debt. Threats, deception, and harassment that crosses into criminal conduct are still off limits, and a licensed attorney in your state can tell you what applies to you.

Can an MCA funder contact my customers about my debt?

It can send them notices. After a default, the UCC-1 financing statement filed when you signed lets a funder notify the people who owe your business money to pay it directly under UCC section 9-406. What it may say to them is limited by laws against deception and by your agreement. Whether a specific notice was proper is a question for a licensed attorney.

Is it legal for an MCA funder to call me many times a day?

Often it is. The call-frequency and call-time limits that consumer debtors rely on come mainly from the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which generally does not cover business debt. Repeated calls that include threats or deception are a different matter under the FTC Act, state law, and criminal law. A licensed attorney in your state can assess the specific calls.

Who else might call me about my MCA debt besides the funder?

An outside collection firm or the funder’s attorney, a broker offering a new advance, and sometimes a debt relief firm you never contacted. A new advance taken to cover an old one adds a position to the stack. A legitimate debt relief firm waits for you to reach out first, and Anchor Resolve never cold calls.

Sources

  • 15 U.S.C. section 1692a, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act definitions of consumer and debt.
  • 15 U.S.C. section 45(a), Federal Trade Commission Act, unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
  • Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, section 9-406 (notification to account debtors to pay the secured party).
  • Federal Trade Commission, press release on the Yellowstone Capital settlement, April 2021.
  • Federal Trade Commission, press release on the permanent ban against Jonathan Braun, October 2023, and press release on the $20.3 million judgment, February 14, 2024.
  • New York Attorney General, press release on the Yellowstone Capital judgment, January 2025.
  • California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, commercial financing regulations applying UDAAP prohibitions, effective October 1, 2023.

This article is general information, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Anchor Resolve is not a law firm. If you are facing a lawsuit, a UCC lien, a frozen account, or a default notice, consider speaking with a licensed attorney in your state. If you want an honest read on your MCA situation, a consultation with us is free and carries no obligation.

Getting calls you do not know how to read?

Free consultation. Fees explained in writing before you enroll.

Keeping your business afloat starts with one call.

Call (561) 397-9829 Text us